Skinput: Appropriating the Body as a great Input Surface
Chris Harrison1, 2, Desney Tan2, Kemudian Morris2 Human-Computer Interaction Company Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PENNSYLVANIA 15213 frank. [email protected] cmu. edu FUZY
Ms Research One Microsoft Method Redmond, WA 98052 desney, dan @microsoft. com propriated areas with all of them (at this time, one might as well just have a greater device). Nevertheless , there is one surface that is previous forgotten as an input fabric, and one which happens to often travel around: our skin. Appropriating the human body because an suggestions device can be appealing not merely because we now have roughly two square yards of external surface area, although also mainly because much of it is easily accessible simply by our hands (e. g., arms, top legs, torso). Furthermore, proprioception вЂ“ our sense showing how our body is definitely configured in three-dimensional space вЂ“ permits us to accurately interact with our bodies within an eyes-free fashion. For example , we can readily film each of our fingers, touch the end of our nostril, and clap our hands together devoid of visual assistance. Few external input products can declare this appropriate, eyes-free type characteristic and offer such a huge interaction region. In this daily news, we present our focus on Skinput вЂ“ a method that enables the body being appropriated for finger suggestions using a new, non-invasive, wearable bio-acoustic sensor. The advantages of this daily news are: 1) We explain the design of a novel, wearable sensor intended for bio-acoustic sign acquisition (Figure 1). 2) We describe an examination approach that allows our system to fix the location of finger shoes on the body.
We present Skinput, a technology that appropriates the human body for traditional acoustic transmission, permitting the skin to get used while an type surface. In particular, we deal with the location of finger shoes on the equip and hand by studying mechanical heurt that propagate through the human body. We collect these signs using a book array of detectors worn as an armband. This approach offers an always readily available, naturally lightweight, and on-body finger suggestions system. All of us assess the functions, accuracy and limitations of our technique through a two-part, twenty-participant user research. To further demonstrate the energy of our procedure, we determine with many proof-of-concept applications we produced. Author Keywords
Bio-acoustics, ring finger input, switches, gestures, on-body interaction, projected displays, music interfaces. ACM Classification Keywords
H. five. 2 [User Interfaces]: Input devices and tactics; B. 5. 2 [Input/Output Devices]: Channels and controllers Standard terms: Human being Factors LAUNCH
Devices with significant computational power and capabilities can be easily continued our bodies. Yet , their tiny size commonly leads to limited interaction space (e. g., diminutive monitors, buttons, and jog wheels) and consequently reduces their functionality and functionality. Since we all cannot just make switches and monitors larger without losing the primary advantage of small size, we consider alternative methods that enhance interactions with small mobile phone systems. A single option is always to opportunistically suitable surface area in the environment for interactive reasons. For example ,  describes a strategy that allows a little mobile device to turn desks on which this rests into a gestural finger input canvas. However , desks are not usually present, and a mobile context, users are not likely to want to carry apPermission to make digital or perhaps hard replications of all or part of this kind of work for personal or classroom use is naturally without fee provided that clones are not produced or given away for income or commercial advantage and that copies keep this notice and the total citation on the first webpage. To copy or else, or republish, to post on servers or redistribute to lists, needs prior certain permission and a fee. CHIHUAHUA 2010, Apr 10вЂ“15, 2010, Atlanta, Atlanta, USA. Copyright laws 2010 ACM...
References: 1 ) Ahmad, Farrenheit., and Musilek, P. A Keystroke and Pointer Control Input User interface for Wearable Computers. In Proc. IEEE PERCOM '06, 2-11. installment payments on your Amento, M., Hill, W., and Terveen, L. The Sound of One Palm: A Wrist-mounted Bio-acoustic Fingertip Gesture Software. In CHI вЂ02 Ext. Abstracts, 724-725. 3. Argyros, A. A., and Lourakis, M. I actually. A. Vision-based Interpretation of Hand Actions for Handy remote control of a Sensitive mouse. In Proc. ECCV 2006 Workshop in Computer Vision in HCI, LNCS 3979, 40-51. some. Burges, C. J. A Tutorial in Support Vector Machines for Pattern Identification. Data Exploration and Understanding Discovery, installment payments on your 2, 06 1998, 121-167. 5. Specialized medical Guidelines around the Identification, Analysis, and Remedying of Overweight and Obesity in grown-ups. National Cardiovascular, Lung and Blood Commence. Jun. 18, 1998. 6. Deyle, To., Palinko, S i9000., Poole, Elizabeth. S., and Starner, To. Hambone: A Bio-Acoustic Motion Interface. In Proc. ISWC '07. 1-8. 7. Erol, A., Bebis, G., Nicolescu, M., Boyle, R. Deb., and Twombly, X. Vision-based hand present estimation: A review. Computer Eyesight and Picture Understanding. 108, Oct., 2007. 8. Fabiani, G. E. McFarland, M. J. Wolpaw, J. 3rd there’s r. and Pfurtscheller, G. Change of ELEKTROENZEPHALOGRAFIE activity into cursor activity by a brain-computer interface (BCI). IEEE Trans. on Nerve organs Systems and Rehabilitation Anatomist, 12. 3, 331-8. September. 2004.
being unfaithful. Grimes, G., Tan, D., Hudson, T. E., Shenoy, P., and Rao, Ur. Feasibility and pragmatics of classifying doing work memory weight with an electroencephalograph. Proc. CHI '08, 835-844. 12. Harrison, C., and Hudson, S. At the. Scratch Suggestions: Creating Significant, Inexpensive, Unpowered and Portable finger Insight Surfaces. In Proc. UIST '08, 205-208. 11. Hirshfield, L. M., Solovey, At the. T., Girouard, A., Kebinger, J., John, R. T., Sassaroli, A., and Fantini, S. Brain measurement to get usability tests and adaptive interfaces: an example of uncovering syntactic workload with functional close to infrared spectroscopy. In Proc. CHI 09, 2185-2194. 12. Ishii, H., Wisneski, C., Orbanes, J., and Chun, B., Paradiso, J. PingPongPlus: design of a great athletic-tangible program for computer-supported cooperative perform. Proc. CHIHUAHUA '99, 394-401. 13. Lakshmipathy, V., Schmandt, C., and Marmasse, N. TalkBack: a conversational answering machine. In Proc. UIST '03, 41-50. 14. Lee, J. C., and Tan, D. S i9000. Using a low-cost electroencephalograph intended for task classification in HCI research. In Proc. CHI '06, 81-90. 15. Lyons, K., Skeels, C., Starner, T., Snoeck, C. M., Wong, N. A., and Ashbrook, M. Augmenting interactions using dualpurpose speech. In Proc. UIST '04. 237-246. 16. Mandryk, R. L., and Atkins, M. S i9000. A Fluffy Physiological Strategy for Consistently Modeling Feeling During Connection with Play Environments. Intl Journal of Human-Computer Research, 6(4), 329-347, 2007. seventeen. Mandryk, R. L., Inkpen, K. M., and Calvert, T. T. Using Psychophysiological Techniques to Assess User Experience with Entertainment Systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(2), 141-58, Drive 2006. 18. McFarland, M. J., Sarnacki, W. A., and Wolpaw, J. Ur. BrainвЂ“ computer system interface (BCI) operation: enhancing information transfer rates. Neurological Psychology, 63(3), 237-51. Jul 2003. 19. Mistry, P., Maes, L., and Chang, L. WUW - use Ur universe: a wearable gestural user interface. In CHI вЂ09 Ext. Abst., 4111-4116. 20. Moore, M., and Dua, U. A galvanic skin response interface for people with severe electric motor disabilities. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Availability and Compensation. вЂ04, 48-54. 21. Paradiso, J. A., Leo, C. K., Checka, N., and Hsiao, E. Passive audio knock monitoring for online windows. In CHI вЂ02 Extended Abstracts, 732-733. twenty-two. Post, Electronic. R. and Orth, Meters. Smart Cloth, or " Wearable Garments. вЂќ In Proc. ISWC '97, 167. 23. Rosenberg, R. The biofeedback Pointer: EMG Control of a Two Dimensional Tip. In Proc. ISWC '98, 4-7. twenty four. Saponas, T. S., Bronze, D. S i9000., Morris, M., and Balakrishnan, R. Demonstrating the feasibility of applying forearm electromyography for muscle-computer interfaces. In Proc. CHI '09, 515-24. 25. Sturman, D. L. and Zeltzer, D. A Survey of Glove-based Suggestions. IEEE Comp Graph and Appl, 18. 1, January 1994. dua puluh enam. Wilson, A. PlayAnywhere: a compact interactive tabletop projection-vision system. In Proc. UIST вЂ05, 83-92. twenty seven. Wilson, A. D. Solid computer vision-based detection of pinching for starters and two-handed gesture insight. In Proc. UIST '06, 255-258. 28. Witten, We. H. and Frank, Elizabeth. Data Mining: Practical equipment learning tools and techniques, subsequent Edition, Morgan Kaufmann, S . fransisco, 2005.