Why the Electoral School Should Be Removed and Replace by the Direct Election Voting System
14 – 24 – 2004
Ever since its creation in the Constitutional Meeting in 1787, the Electoral College is the most widely contested aspect in the Constitution. There were over seven hundred proposed constitutional amendments geared towards fixing or abolishing this procedure. And Our elected representatives has on a number of occasions held highly advertised hearings upon Electoral University reform although overall has always been fairly inactive (Best, p. vii). And while the Electoral College is a cornerstone of our Constitution and thus a major part of American democracy and federal government, its very nature is fairly unfair and undemocratic. Many of its factors portray biases and favour certain sets of people and certain says. It is considered archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect, and dangerous by many people scholars and it is in direct need of reforming (Kura, p. 30). It especially contradicts Walter Stone's a key component voting version for the Electoral School at first makes one imagine as if one's vote counts but sooner or later one figures out that it is actually quite insignificant (Stone, p. 51). Pertaining to with the Electoral College, those are not in control but rather the device is – the Electoral College president election program that is. But with all these kinds of negative aspects to that one has to wonder what election strategy is the best suited to America plus the best heir to the Electoral College? In answer, I propose the fact that Electoral College should not be reformed but completely gotten gone and replace by a direct political election system, wherever basically the obama administration is determined by a favorite vote. That way, everybody's vote counts equally and it is a much fairer and democratic way of electing the president. When I format all the complications with the Electoral College and why it takes to be changed by the immediate vote election system, you need to have a short understanding of exactly where it came from and for what reason it was build this way.
The Electoral School was created by the delegates to the Constitutional Tradition of 1787 in Phila. and is an item of 18th century politics philosophy and compromise. When the founders set up the Constitution they chose to subject elections to rules that inhibited the formation of permanent electoral majorities (Squire, p. 37). This corelates back to David Madison's disagreement of dispersing power to prevent tyranny (Stone, p. 22). For the founders resorted to this indirect election program because that they feared these government officials that were also responsive to the wishes with the majority. They believed that if federal government officials had been somewhat insulated from the passions of the open public, they would think it is easier to protect the legal rights of the fraction and to encourage the common good (Squire, s. 38). So in order to avoid the majority by continuously having the ability to dominate the minority, that they set up indirect elections, particularly, the Electoral College. This Electoral School, set forth by the rules of the Constitution, allowed states to cast electoral votes comparable to the number of the senators and representatives. The quantity of senators is usually two for every state plus the number of reps depends approximately upon every single state's populace. For example , inside the 2004 political election, California, which has two senators and 53 representatives, players 55 electoral votes, while Wyoming, that has two senators and only one representative, ensemble only three electoral votes. It is important however to note even though that people do not theoretically vote for presidential candidates but rather for electors (Best, l. xi). These electors happen to be collectively referred to as Electoral University and are nominated by the party and are agreed to support the candidates of these party (Kura, p. 1). On the 1st Monday following the second Friday in Dec, they visit their state capitols and players their boule...
Cited: Finest, Judith A. The Choice of those? Debating the Electoral School. Maryland:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1996.
Edwards, George C. Why the Electoral College is definitely Bad For America. New Haven: Yale
University Press, 2004.
Kura, Alexandra, ed. Electoral College and Presidential Polls. Huntington, NY: Nova
Science Publishers, 2001.
Squire, Peverill, et. approach. Dynamics of Democracy. Cincinnati oh.: Atomic Puppy Pub., 2005.
Stone, Walter. Republic at Risk. Santa Barbara: UCSB Bookstore, 1990.